Brian S. Hoffman, CRPC®- CEPA®
Publish Date: June 25, 2026
Not all revenue is created equal in the eyes of a buyer. The mix of income inside your practice may be the single biggest lever you have on your final valuation.
Two advisors. Similar AUM. Similar client counts. Similar years in the business.
One sells at two times revenue. The other sells at three times revenue.
From the outside, the practices look comparable. From the inside, the difference is the revenue composition. One practice generates the majority of its income from recurring advisory fees tied to AUM. The other generates a meaningful portion from insurance commissions, transactional business, and products that required ongoing selling activity to sustain.
Same revenue number. Very different valuation story.
This is the conversation that most advisors have never had explicitly, and it is one of the most important ones for anyone who wants to understand what their practice is actually worth and what they can do about it today.
Why Buyers Pay More for Recurring Revenue
A buyer acquiring your practice is making a bet on the future. Not on what the practice earned last year but on what it will earn going forward, without you, under new management, through a transition that will create at least some uncertainty for clients.
Recurring revenue, true recurring revenue, is the most reliable answer to that question.
AUM based advisory fees that are contractually established, consistently billed, and tied to ongoing relationships that do not require active selling to maintain tell a buyer something specific. They tell them that the income is predictable, that it does not depend on the advisor doing anything beyond delivering consistent service to retain it, and that it has a reasonable probability of holding through a transition.
That predictability has a direct impact on valuation. Buyers apply higher multiples to recurring revenue because the risk associated with that revenue is lower. The income does not disappear if the founder stops selling. It does not evaporate if market conditions shift the product landscape. It is tied to assets under management and to the ongoing relationships that hold those assets. As long as the clients stay, the revenue stays.
Transactional and commission based revenue tells a different story. It depends on activity. On new sales. On the advisor’s ongoing involvement in generating it. A buyer acquiring a practice with significant transactional income is acquiring uncertainty about whether that income continues at the same level without the person who generated it. That uncertainty is priced into the multiple.
The Valuation Premium Is Real and It Is Significant
The difference in valuation multiples between a highly recurring practice and a hybrid or transactional practice is not marginal. It is meaningful enough to represent a significant dollar difference on the same revenue base.
Practices where recurring advisory fees represent 95 percent or more of total revenue consistently command valuation premiums compared to hybrid practices at the same revenue level. The research from Advisor Growth Strategies and Succession Resource Group reflects this consistently. Buyers recognize that the revenue quality is fundamentally different and they pay accordingly.
For an advisor with a million dollar revenue practice, the difference between a two times and a three times revenue multiple is a million dollars. That is not a rounding error. That is the direct financial consequence of revenue composition, and it is entirely within the advisor’s control to address over time.
What Counts as Truly Recurring
This is where the conversation requires some honesty.
Not every fee-based revenue stream is as recurring as it appears. There is a spectrum of revenue quality even within the category of advisory fees, and buyers understand that spectrum clearly.
At the strongest end is contractual AUM based fees billed directly from client accounts on a consistent schedule, tied to ongoing advisory agreements that are documented and current. This is the revenue that buyers pay the highest premiums for. It is predictable, auditable, and operationally straightforward to transfer.
Advisory fees that are billed consistently but based on informal arrangements, without signed agreements or clear documentation, introduce uncertainty. A buyer cannot verify what the client agreed to or whether the arrangement will hold without the founder’s personal involvement. That uncertainty discounts the revenue even when the dollar amount looks the same on paper.
Planning fees and retainers that are tied to ongoing service agreements are also considered recurring but require the buyer to evaluate whether the service model that supports them will transfer. Clients paying for a planning relationship are paying for access to the advisor’s expertise and responsiveness. If that relationship was built entirely around one person, the retainer revenue is less secure than the fee schedule suggests.
Commission and insurance revenue is the most discounted category in any valuation conversation. It depends on ongoing activity and cannot be assumed to continue at the same level after a transition. Some buyers will include it in the valuation at a heavily discounted multiple. Others will treat it as essentially non-recurring and value it accordingly.
The Conversion Work That Changes Your Multiple
If your revenue mix today includes meaningful transactional or commission income, the most direct thing you can do to improve your eventual valuation is convert as many of those relationships as possible to ongoing advisory fee arrangements.
This is not always possible with every client. Some clients are product buyers by preference and no amount of conversation will shift them toward a fee relationship. But many clients who are currently in transactional arrangements are there because nobody ever offered them an alternative, or because the conversation about converting to a fee relationship was never had.
Having that conversation, systematically, across your transactional client base, with a clear explanation of what the fee relationship includes and why it serves them better than the transactional alternative, is one of the highest leverage business development activities an advisor can do. It improves client service. It improves revenue predictability. And it directly improves the multiple a buyer will apply to your practice when the time comes.
The math is worth doing explicitly. If you have two hundred thousand dollars in commission and transactional revenue today and you convert half of it to recurring advisory fees over three years, you have not just improved your revenue composition. You have potentially added several hundred thousand dollars to your eventual sale price, depending on the multiples applied.
Recurring Revenue and Client Retention Are Connected
There is another dimension to this conversation that goes beyond the valuation multiple.
Clients who are in ongoing advisory fee relationships tend to experience a higher level of consistent service than clients in transactional arrangements. They have regular reviews. They have proactive communication. They have a structured relationship that gives them something to point to when someone asks why they stay.
That service consistency is also what drives retention through a transition. The clients most likely to stay when an advisor transitions are the clients who have been in structured, ongoing relationships with the practice rather than episodic transactional ones. The recurring revenue base is not just more valuable in a valuation model. It is more durable through the disruption of a transition.
Building a practice with a high recurring revenue percentage is not just a valuation strategy. It is a client experience strategy. And both outcomes flow from the same set of decisions about how you structure your relationships and deliver your service.
Where to Start
If you have not recently looked at your revenue composition with a buyer’s eyes, that is the most useful place to start.
Break your revenue into its categories. What percentage is truly recurring, contractually based, and tied to ongoing relationships that do not require active selling to maintain. What percentage is transactional, commission based, or dependent on the advisor’s ongoing activity to sustain. What percentage falls somewhere in between.
That picture tells you where your multiple is today and where it could be with deliberate work over time.
The advisors who command the strongest valuations when they eventually sell are almost universally the ones who understood this picture clearly enough and early enough to do something about it. The conversion work takes time. The results, in terms of both practice quality and eventual valuation, are worth every bit of the effort it takes to get there.
If you want to understand what your revenue composition looks like through a buyer’s lens and what it would take to improve it, that is a conversation we have regularly.
Schedule a Confidential Conversation
Built By Advisors | Brian S. Hoffman, CRPC®, CEPA® www.builtbyadvisors.com | [email protected] | 908.888.0007
Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services offered through Gladstone Institutional Advisory, a Registered Investment Advisor. Built By Advisors, Gladstone Institutional Advisory LLC and LPL Financial are separate entities.