Brian S. Hoffman, CRPC®- CEPA®
Publish Date: September 15, 2026
On either side of the table, it’s not the headline multiple that determines the wins and losses, it’s the structure you build in.
I came into a deal like this after the fact, brought on once the ink was already dry, to work with the acquiring advisor bring in additional new clients. What I watched play out over the following three years taught me more about deal structure than any term sheet template ever could.
Most advisors spend years thinking about what their practice is worth. Far fewer spend real time thinking about how the deal that captures that value actually gets built. That gap is where money quietly gets left behind.
Here’s what actually happened in that deal. The seller negotiated a 4x multiple, above the roughly 3x the market was generally paying at the time. Half of it, 2.0x, came as cash at close with zero conditions, zero clawbacks, zero guarantees required. The other half was structured as an earnout across two tranches, one with twelve-month performance parameters, one with thirty-six-month parameters. The buyer, a firm just entering its enterprise growth phase, wanted the AUM and the credibility of bringing on an experienced advisor badly enough to accept those upfront terms.
Then the transition didn’t go as planned. The acquired advisor lacked the transition support he needed, and the earnout ultimately paid out at only 70% of target. On paper, that sounds like a loss. It wasn’t one. Two full points locked in at close, plus 1.4 points from the shortfall earnout, still added up to 3.4x, above the 3x market rate, even after everything that went wrong on the back end.
The structure is what saved the deal. Not the headline number.
Cash at Close
This is the simplest piece and the only one with no conditions attached.
- No performance requirements. It isn’t tied to retention, integration, or how the buyer runs the business after you’re gone.
- No future risk. Every other component of a deal carries some form of contingency. This one doesn’t.
- The most negotiable piece early, and the least negotiable piece late. Once you’ve accepted terms and the deal has momentum, this number rarely moves again.
Cash at close has been shrinking industry-wide. It ran close to 80% of total consideration back in 2019. Today it typically lands between 55% and 65%, with PE-backed buyers sometimes offering as little as 40%. That’s the market backdrop every seller is negotiating against right now, and it’s exactly why the deal above worked. Getting to 50% at close with zero strings, in a market where 55-65% is now closer to the ceiling than the floor, was the single decision that made the rest of the deal survivable.
Earnouts
An earnout ties a portion of the purchase price to future performance, typically over one to three years, most commonly measured by client retention.
- Retention is the most common trigger, a defined percentage of acquired clients staying through the transition period.
- Earnouts aren’t inherently bad. They can bridge a real valuation gap and align incentives so the seller stays engaged through the transition.
- But they carry risk the seller doesn’t fully control. If the buyer’s transition support falls short, the seller is the one absorbing the shortfall, exactly what happened in the deal above.
Before signing, know precisely what triggers the payment, what reduces it, who actually controls the factors driving the outcome, and how retention gets measured. An earnout tied to things you can influence is a fundamentally different instrument than one that lives entirely at the mercy of how well the buyer executes.
Equity Rollovers
A rollover converts part of the purchase price into equity in the acquiring platform instead of cash. You become a shareholder, participating in whatever value the platform creates going forward.
This shows up most in PE-backed and aggregator deals. Rollover equity now represents somewhere between 20% and 40% of total consideration in a typical transaction, a real and growing piece of how these deals get built, not a minor add-on.
- What percentage of the platform the equity actually represents
- What rights come with it
- How it’s valued today, and on what assumptions
- What the expected exit timeline looks like, and what governs it
- What happens to your equity if the platform itself gets sold before that exit
These are the same questions any sophisticated investor asks before putting money into something they don’t control.
Seller Financing
In many smaller, advisor-to-advisor transactions, part of the price gets financed by the seller directly, paid over three to five years with interest.
- You’re extending credit, not just selling a practice. Vet the buyer the way a lender would.
- Build in real protections, security interests and default provisions that hold if retention or performance slips after the transition.
This isn’t a reason to avoid seller financing. It’s a reason to underwrite the buyer’s creditworthiness as carefully as you’d want them underwriting your practice.
How These Pieces Work Together
Almost no real transaction uses one pure form. The deal above blended two components, 50% cash and 50% earnout, and that blend is exactly what determined the outcome. A large earnout stacked on top of a meaningful equity rollover means a much bigger share of your number stays at risk well after closing. A strong cash position at close, even a partial one, is what gives a seller room to absorb it if something downstream doesn’t go to plan.
The Negotiating Window
The time to negotiate structure is before you’ve accepted terms, not after. Once a deal has momentum, the buyer knows you’re in, and specific terms get a lot harder to move.
The advisors who land the best structural outcomes are the ones who treated structure as equally important as the headline number from the very first conversation, not a detail to sort out once the big decisions were already made.
What Good Structure Actually Looks Like
The best outcomes in a negotiation rarely mean one side got everything. The deal above worked precisely because both sides gave something up. The buyer offered generous upfront terms it might not offer again today, in exchange for the AUM and credibility it wanted. The seller absorbed a real earnout shortfall it didn’t fully control. Neither side walked away with a perfect outcome, and both walked away whole, with clients taken care of and lessons learned that shaped how each side structured the next deal.
That’s usually what a well-built deal actually looks like. Not a win on every line item. A structure sturdy enough that even the parts that go wrong don’t sink the whole thing.
If you’re thinking about a future sale and want to understand what deal structures actually look like in your market, and what to push for before you’re at the table, that’s exactly the kind of preparation we help advisors build before they need it.
Schedule a Confidential Conversation
Built By Advisors | Brian S. Hoffman, CRPC®, CEPA® www.builtbyadvisors.com | [email protected] | 908.888.0007
Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services offered through Gladstone Institutional Advisory, a Registered Investment Advisor. Built By Advisors, Gladstone Institutional Advisory LLC and LPL Financial are separate entities.